Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Boomgaarden finds that the lower court properly dismissed claims from an insurance company that brought a negligence action against a tenant leasing a commercial property that sustained fire damage. Under the relevant insurance documents and agreements between the insurance company, the property owner and the tenant, it was "reasonably expected" that the insurance company, not the tenant, would be tasked with compensation for any losses stemming from fire damage. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.