Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free[Modified.] [Consolidated.] J. Tucher makes a couple of changes to footnotes and denies a petition for rehearing with no change in judgment. The trial court properly rejected Environmental Quality Act challenges to the long-range development plan for the University of California, San Francisco campus. The plan's environmental impact report adequately considered alternative development plans and the actions needed to mitigate wind impacts. The report should have considered public transit impacts, but the omission was not prejudicial because the report provides enough information to inform the public about the project's likely adverse impacts. The school was not required to analyze visual impacts because the development is an infill site, nor was it required to adopt mitigation measures for historical buildings that will be repurposed. Affirmed.