Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Loken finds a lower court properly imposed a revocation sentence and no contact order on a defendant who was convicted for domestic abuse of his fiancée. The defendant, who abuses alcohol, argued that the order is unreasonable because they own a restaurant together. However, the government presented sufficient evidence in court that an imposition of Condition 8, a ban on the defendant from communicating with his fiancée during supervised release, would likely protect her from future abuse. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.