Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Lee finds that the district court improperly denied various gun rights groups’ motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin a California law that prohibits the advertising of any “firearm-related product in a manner that is designed, intended, or reasonably appears to be attractive to minors.” Because California permits minors under supervision to possess and use firearms for hunting and other lawful activities, the law facially regulates speech that concerns lawful activity and is not misleading. The law "does not directly and materially advance California’s substantial interests in reducing gun violence and the unlawful use of firearms by minors" and "there was no evidence in the record that a minor in California has ever unlawfully bought a gun, let alone because of an ad."