Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Jordan finds that the district court properly ruled in favor of the college regarding a student's claims for breach of contract and violations of Title IX. The action arose after the college found the student violated its sexual misconduct policy by sexually assaulting a female student. The male student did not claim that he was incapacitated and there is no evidence that the college discriminated against him on the basis of sex by failing to investigate the female student. The college's decision to inquire about the student's past sexual history was not suggestive of gender bias in light of an anonymous allegation that he had sexually assaulted three other female students. The student failed to show that the Title IX investigator had or acted on gender bias. The district court correctly precluded the student's expert, a history professor, from presenting opinions about the college's purported gender bias. Affirmed.