Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Wilson finds that the district court properly ruled in favor of the university in a breach of contract action brought by the student alleging that the university should refund a portion of her spring 2020 tuition payment because she did not receive the expected benefit of in-person learning due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The district court correctly found that even if a contract between the parties did exist, the university retained the right to alter its procedures and temporarily close its facilities in response to the pandemic. The student's unjust enrichment claim fails because she did not show that the value of the benefit she received in the form of a temporarily remote education was out of step with the value of the tuition payment she provided to the university. Affirmed.