Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreePer curiam, the Fifth Circuit finds the district court improperly dismissed constitutional claims against the sheriff, alleging deliberate indifference and failure to train. The claimant was arrested after a verbal altercation, and under suspicion of intoxication. After he was processed into the county jail, with each interacting officer saying that he seemed to be intoxicated, the claimant was found unresponsive, transferred to the medical center and was found to be experiencing diabetic complications, with no alcohol or drugs in his system. Case law regarding failure to train was misconstrued as requiring the claimant to establish deliberate indifference and defeat qualified immunity. The Fifth Circuit states that previous liability cases are helpful in determining a supervisor’s notice of unconstitutional behavior by staff but has never held that such are required to prevail. Allegations against other officers and jail staff fail to state a claim or do not defeat qualified immunity. Reversed in part. Affirmed in part. Dismissed in part.