Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Chesney finds in favor of two California pet food manufacturers in the consumers' class action alleging that they were tricked into thinking the manufacturers' pet food contains medicine because the pet food had to be prescribed by a vet. As an industry standard, being prescribed a certain pet food by a vet is not necessarily an indication that the pet food contains drugs or medicine, and the products already have accurate, clear ingredient lists that do not require a veterinarian to understand.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.