Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Grassl Bradley finds the court of appeals improperly reversed the circuit court's order affirming the state claims board's decision to award the citizen $25,000 after he sought more than $5.7 million for being wrongfully imprisoned for 26 years for murder as a party to a crime even though he was innocent, having participated in an assault of the victim before the murder but not the murder itself. Even though the claims board is on the record saying the citizen was innocent of the murder charge, the relevant statute does not require the claims board to submit a report to the state legislature arguing for more than the $25,000 statutory maximum compensation if it does not find that amount adequate, nor is it required to address the citizen's claim for further damages in its final decision. Because the board did not find $25,000 to be inadequate, and because nothing in the law requires it to make a specific adequacy finding or take further action to explain its decision-making, the citizen's appeal for a re-hearing fails. Reversed.