Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Ebel finds that the lower court in large part properly issued an award to a company that prevailed in a dispute with a competitor that was misrepresenting the ingredients in its products and manipulating reviews on Amazon. While the lower court erred by not considering the request for punitive damages, the award of profits, attorney fees and other costs were all supported by the record. More proceedings are called for regarding the punitive damages request. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.