Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Randolph finds the lower court improperly found that a tenant committed conversion and breached its lease with a building owner when it removed equipment that was affixed to the building. The tenant purchased a commercial business from the building owner but leased the building. The parties agreed to an Asset Purchase Agreement (APA) that stated the tenant purchased the business and all property necessary to conduct the business. When the tenant moved to a new location, it took the equipment, but the building owner said the equipment belonged to it because the equipment was attached to the building and had been excluded from the APA. The lower court agreed. But the instant court finds the equipment is included in the APA, as it is part of all the assets necessary to conduct the business. The tenant is responsible for any damage that may have occurred as a result of removing the equipment, and the matter is remanded to determine the amount of damages to repair the building. Reversed in part.