Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Falk finds a lower court improperly ruled in favor of revenue and customs on a bank's challenge of corporation tax treatments. The revenue and customs authority argued that the bank was not entitled to collect corporate royalty payments after it acquired an oil and gas corporation. However, the bank presented sufficient evidence court that it was entitled to royalty payments because the acquisition between the parties was not a separate "ring fence" oil- related activity.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.