Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Urias mostly denies motions for summary judgment brought by an insurance company in a lawsuit against a trucking company that allegedly caused an accident with another truck carrying pharmaceutical products insured by the insurance company, damaging those products. A motion declaring the “wholesale acquisition costs” of the products to be “the accurate measure of damages” is denied because the trucking company disputes this measure and this disagreement would be best resolved through specific pretrial motions — though this court has “serious doubts” about the trucking company’s proposed analysis of damages. Summary judgment is partially granted on the trucking company’s “Affirmative Defense of Mitigation” because while the trucking company can argue at trial that the insurance company and its client did not do enough to save the products, it has not provided yet adequate evidence of this assertion.