Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Rowland partially grants the defendant machine shop’s motion for summary judgment while denying the plaintiff machine shop’s cross-motion for summary judgment in this case over military-compliant fasteners. The plaintiff shop claims the defendant shop violated trademark laws by buying plaintiff’s fasteners, altering them and selling them to its customers as compliant with military specifications. The court grants the defendant shop’s claim for summary judgement as to the “word marks,” i.e., the plaintiff shops’ brand identifiers, which are present on the defendant’s fasteners, as the plaintiff has not sufficiently explained why those marks cannot appear on the fasteners when they are meant for military and not commercial use. All other claims from all parties survive.