Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Schiltz denies the pawnbroker and payday lenders' motion to compel arbitration in the consumers' suit alleging that sensitive data was stolen from the pawnbroker's computer network. The pawnbroker knew of its right to arbitrate because the relevant arbitration causes appeared in the contracts it drafted, and it acted inconsistently with its right to arbitrate by moving to dismiss and otherwise participating in litigation before raising the possibility of arbitration.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.