Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. McKinnon finds that the the state did not undermine a non-binding plea agreement when it made supplemental comments about victim impact statements prior to sentencing defendant. The state argued for the plea agreement in good faith before the trial court rejected its sentencing recommendation of probation in favor of a 10-year sentence. However, the trial court lacked statutory authority to require defendant to register as a sex offender as a condition of his sentence. Reversed in part.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.