Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Du, on limited remand from the Ninth Circuit, makes factual findings responsive to the appeals court's questions. The firearms advocacy group originally brought constitutional challenges against a particular Nevada bill, which were dismissed. The group, in this remand from its appeal, presents the proposed findings that citizens were not prevented from making their own firearms during the relevant historical period, but offers no evidence to support this. The government officials' proposed findings are "mostly adopted," as they are supported by an expert report showing how the challenged law is analogous to founding-era laws that disarmed people considered dangerous, and imposed time, place and manner restrictions on the use of firearms.
