Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Hull finds the trial court properly denied the petitioner’s request for a writ of mandate seeking a manual recount of ballots that had been early “machine read,” by jurisdictions “having the necessary computer capability,” which the petitioner claims violate election code prohibiting accessing and releasing a vote count prior to the day of an election. Election code allows counties to begin scanning ballots on the 10th business day before the election. This is not a process of tabulation. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate any law violation. Other claims lack merit. Affirmed.
